Research and Evaluation

Advancing dialogue through research-driven insights

OUR RESEARCH

Early in the development of the Dignity Index, we knew we wanted to root our efforts in rigorous research.  The concepts underpinning the Dignity Index draw from the work of conflict resolution expert Donna Hicks, and the first introduction of the Dignity Index to the public involved a Pilot Project partnership with researchers at the University of Utah.  Since then, we have tested key assumptions by convening a National Citizens Panel and we released the 2026 Dignity Barometer, a first-of-its kind national survey on dignity in March 2026.  An annual report on Dignity in America, including data from the 2026 Dignity Barometer, will be released in July 2026.

Sound research is important because it establishes formally what we’ve seen firsthand – people of different political backgrounds can agree on what constitutes dignity and contempt – regardless of whether they have the same background or perspective as the speaker.  It seems difficult to believe in a time of great polarization, but our research shows that agreement on dignity and contempt can be the building blocks to achieving our goals of easing divisions, preventing violence, and solving problems.

THE RESEARCH AND EVALUATION TEAM

Undertakes research projects to:

  • Establish the Dignity Index as a reliable tool for measuring dignity and contempt

  • Provide national longitudinal measures of where and how Americans experience dignity and contempt

  • Coordinate opportunities for dignity leaders to connect and learn from each other

  • Develop evaluation measures and review evaluation data for Dignity Index programing

  • Support the Dignity Daily game

RESEARCH PROJECTS

  • In September 2022, a team from the University of Utah including the Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute, the David Eccles School of Business, and the Hinckley Institute of Politics partnered with UNITE to pilot the Dignity Index.

    The Pilot Project showed that university students from differing political backgrounds could be trained to apply the Dignity Index to political speech and develop consensus around passage scores.  Student scorers treated each other with dignity as they worked to achieve consensus, and their interactions underscored the premise that easing divisions and solving problems involve the same set of skills. Additionally, the Pilot Project uncovered an unexpected outcome – the Mirror Effect. 

    Many student coders reported their involvement with the Dignity Index prompted them to personally reflect on their own language and the contemptuous media they were consuming.  Beyond learning how to score the speech of others, students made changes in their own behavior.

    Read the Technical Summary HERE

  • Prior to the 2024 elections, UNITE partnered with More in Common and ROI Rocket to assemble and train a panel of about 80 people who were largely representative of the US population across key demographic characteristics (including political ideology) to score language related to the election using the 8-point Dignity Index. 

    We wanted to know – could people agree upon whether a passage of speech represented dignity or contempt regardless of whether they agreed with the speaker politically?

    Thirty-six weeks of data show remarkably high rates of interrater reliability. Across more than 19,000 scores collected from panelists, 92% showed agreement with the majority’s assessment of dignity or contempt. Only about 3% of scores could even possibly be attributed to partisanship — such as failing to recognize dignity from the “other side” or contempt from one’s own — and the true figure is likely even lower. These results instill confidence that regardless of the speaker’s political ideology, people of all political stripes are largely able to agree on what constitutes dignity and contempt. A full report will be released in coming months, including detailed interrater reliability findings showing substantially higher agreement than would be expected by chance alone.

  • Released in March 2026, the Dignity Barometer was the first-ever national survey of America’s opinions on dignity, including where and how they experience dignity and contempt in their daily lives. Measurements include the American public’s perceptions of dignity in different subcultures such as family, schools, universities/colleges, politics, government, news/media, places of worship, and the workplace. The 2026 Barometer serves as the baseline for an annual, longitudinal measure of dignity in America. Click here for the findings.

  • The 2026 report will draw from Dignity Barometer data to discuss key findings and the implications for cultural change and Dignity in America.

  • On October 20, 2025, UNITE and the Dignity.us team gathered together a trailblazing group of leaders, changemakers, and others interested in building cultures of dignity - cultures that ease division, prevent violence, and help communities solve problems together. With conflict resolution expert Donna Hicks as the keynote speaker and subject matter experts in workplace culture, K-12 programming, higher education, and politics sharing their most valuable insights and strategies during breakout sessions.

  • Each day the Dignity Daily game provides an opportunity to practice scoring speech using the Dignity Index.  You’ll see examples from entertainment, business, politics, and more — along with the reasoning behind each score. It’s a simple, interactive way to build your skills at recognizing dignity and contempt in everyday language. Download the app! Or practice online: https://thedaily.dignity.us/

RESEARCH TOOLKIT

Analysis in Brief  National Citizens Panel

LEARN MORE

Questions about Research and Evaluation? Fill out this form to get in touch with the Research team.